Discussion about this post

User's avatar
ChinArb's avatar

Clean data, and it lands on a date that matters. This is the first full quarter after the Iran war, and the numbers read like a checklist of things that were supposed to take years.

Start with the one line you almost wave off. Germany's top single export to China is now unwrought gold — fourth in 2024, outside the top ten before 2023, first today. You're right that price inflates the value. But price doesn't reorder a table. Cars and car parts fell while gold climbed past them. And Germany has no active gold mines. So this isn't Germany selling what it makes. It's the old aristocrat selling the family gold to buy back the goods it used to build. A manufacturing power's largest line to China is now a metal it digs out of its own vaults. No gold price explains that sentence.

Spain's version is copper ore. Same shape: Europe ships China the atoms, China ships Europe the finished things.

Then the cars. EU duties hit battery-electric specifically. Pure-electric share of Chinese car imports fell from 86% to 48% — and hybrids came up 184% to fill the gap. The tariff worked exactly as written and changed nothing that mattered. I argued in The Great Detour that a tariff is a dam, not a wall: the flow doesn't stop, it routes. Here's the routing, on a one-year delay.

None of this is a forecast anymore. It's a receipt. I wrote before the war that the manufacturing center of gravity would keep sliding from one system to the other, and that Europe's industrial core would feel it first. Q1 is the first reading off that clock. The gold line is the tell: when your largest export to a country is the thing in your safe rather than the thing on your factory floor, the trade balance has stopped being about trade — and started being about which system still makes things, and which one is selling its vaults to keep buying them. That's the part the deficit number can't show you. I've written out where this leads on my page, if it's useful.

Renato Pisani's avatar

If the EU wishes to remain competitive, it should be planning long term. What's required is strong investing in automation, digital & AI infrastructure. That is the backbone for the idustry to grow. However, it would be necessary to limit capital outflows to the US and China, maximizing investment within the EU.

China is winning the EV race because of well-planned large investments in R&D and vibrant market competition: their cars just got better. EU should be focusing on creating a similar underlying, pro-tech and pro-risk market environment.

However, EU must invest more in the well-being of its citizens, increasing the social safety net. If basic needs are secured, EU citizens will be less risk-averse and contribute more to the market. In this context, the current militarization appears as a quite alarming and short viewed misallocation of resources.

No posts

Ready for more?